03/04/2021 21:18
The paper discusses an experimental apparatus consisting of an elastic shell, comprised of a material with Young's modulus E, having the shape of a hemispherical cap of radius R and thickness h:

The cap is sealed on a support which makes it possible to extract air from the interior, which results in a net pressure p from the exterior.
If p is sufficiently large then the shell undergoes elastic instability. For a perfect shell the critical value p_c of the pressure is know to scale as:[^]
p_c\sim E\left(\frac {h}R\right)^2.
Experiments show that the actual buckling pressure p_{\rm max} (the maximal pressure that the shell can withstand before collapsing) is smaller than the theoretical value. Such discrepancy is summarized by the knockdown factor:
\kappa_{\mathrm{d}}=\frac{p_{\max }}{p_{\mathrm{c}}},
which, according to experimental evidence, varies between 0.05 and 0.9. [1] It was Koiter who understood first that such discrepancy is to be attributed to imperfections.
In the experimental setup described in this paper, the material that comprises the shell possesses a "residual" magnetic induction \mathbf B^{\rm r}, whose orientation is in the vertical direction. An external device is capable of producing an applied induction field \mathbf B^{\rm a}, as shown in the figure:

The interaction between the applied and residual induction is modeled through the magnetic energy
\mathcal{U}_{\mathrm{m}}=-\int \frac{1}{\mu_{0}} \mathbf{F} \mathbf{B}^{r} \cdot \mathbf{B}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathrm{d} V
where \mathbf F is the deformation gradient.
Experiments show that the knowndown factor increases if \mathbf B^{\rm a} and \mathbf B^{\rm r} point in the same direction, and decreases otherwise. To quantitatively assess the role of the applied field, the paper identifies as a key quantity the following magneto-elastic parameter:
\lambda_{\mathrm{m}}=\frac{B^{\mathrm{r}} B^{\mathrm{a}}}{\mu_{0} E},\tag{*}
and deduces that the presence of the magnetic field produces a changes of the knockdown factor which obeys the scaling law
\Delta \kappa_{\mathrm{d}} \sim \lambda_{\mathrm{m}} \frac{R}{h}.
The estimate of the knockdown factor is based on the assumption that the displacements induced by the external pressure are of the order of the thickness h of the shell.
Energies are renormalized through the characteristic energy
\mathcal E=\pi E h R^{2} /\left(4\left(1-\nu^{2}\right)\right)\sim EhR^2
Note that this energy is of the order of the volume of the shell.
With this renormalization, the work of the pressure is [2]
\overline{\mathcal U}_{\mathrm{p}}\sim \frac{p}{E}
The dominant part of the (renormalized) magnetic energy is identified as:
\overline{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{m}}^{(2) \mathrm{A}}=\frac{8\left(1-\nu^{2}\right)}{R^{2}} \lambda_{\mathrm{m}} \int_{0}^{\pi / 2} \frac{1}{2} \mathring{\chi}(\varphi) \theta^2\mathring a\mathrm{d} \varphi,
where \mathring\chi(\varphi) is a dimensionless quantity, \mathring a is the area measure, and \theta is the local rotation. The local rotation is estimated as:[3]
\theta\sim \sqrt{h/R}
The change of bucking pressure due to the application of the magnetic field is estimated by equating the extra work \overline{\mathcal U}_{\rm m} due to the magnetic field with the extra work \Delta\overline{\mathcal U}_{\rm p} of the pressure:
\lambda_m\frac h R \sim\overline{\mathcal U}_{\rm m}=\Delta\overline{\mathcal U}_{\rm P}\sim \frac {\Delta p}E\qquad\Rightarrow\qquad\Delta p\sim E\lambda_{\rm m}\frac{h}{R}
The change of knockdown factor is
\Delta\kappa_{\rm d}=\frac{\Delta p}{p_c}\sim \frac{E\lambda_{\rm m}\frac{h}{R}}{E\left(\frac h R\right)^2}.
This yields the main result (*).
Carlson, R. L., Sendelbeck, R. L. & Hoff, N. J. Experimental studies of the buckling of complete spherical shells. Exp. Mech. 7,281-288(1967) . ↩︎
The work of the pressure is \mathcal U_P\sim \frac{p}{E} \Delta V, where \Delta V is the variation of volume enclosed in the shell. From the assumption that displacements are of the order of the thickness h it follows that the variation of volume obeys the scaling law \Delta V\sim hR^2. Accordingly, the renormalized pressure obeys the law \overline{\mathcal U}_P\sim \frac{p}{E}. ↩︎
QUESTION: In S3.3 the paper argues that the majority of the deformation of the shell takes place in the neighborhood of the north pole, within a length that scales with the boundary layer \sim \sqrt{R h}, so that angles will scale with the angular width of that boundary layer as \sim \sqrt{h / R}. This result means that \theta \sim \sqrt{h / R}. This argument is not clear at all... ↩︎